Yes. The Last Duel true story reveals that prior to his marriage to Marguerite de Thibouville in 1380, Jean de Carrouges had been married to Jeanne de Tilly, the Lord of Chambois' daughter. The two were married in the early 1370s. Jeanne gave birth to a son not long after their wedding. Carrouges' friend and neighbor, Jacques Le Gris, was chosen to be the boy's godfather. In the late 1370s, tragedy struck the family when both Jeanne and their son died of unknown natural causes, likely illness. To help channel his grief, Carrouges left home to fight the English under the command of Jean de Vienne in a five-month campaign. -Eric Jager
Yes. Like in The Last Duel movie, the true story confirms that Pierre d'Alençon (portrayed by Ben Affleck) was the cousin of King Charles VI and the overlord of both Jean de Carrouges (Matt Damon) and Jacques Le Gris (Adam Driver). Count Pierre had inherited the county of Perche from his brother Robert and with it the fealty of his brother's vassals, including Carrouges and Le Gris.
Yes. As indicated earlier, the two men were initially neighbors and friends. However, after both men joined the court circle of their new overlord, Count Pierre d'Alençon, their friendship deteriorated when the Count began to favor Jacques Le Gris (played by Adam Driver) and overlooked Jean de Carrouges (portrayed by Matt Damon). In researching The Last Duel's historical accuracy, we learned that Le Gris brought in more money and was educated, making him more valuable to the court. The Count rewarded Le Gris' service on the court with a newly purchased estate at Aunou-le-Faucon. Le Gris also inherited his father's lordship of the castle at Exmes. This made Carrouges jealous of Le Gris and they became rivals on the court.
Yes. By marrying Marguerite de Thibouville, who at the time was described as "young, beautiful, good, sensible and modest," Jean de Carrouges hoped to inherit the valuable estate of Aunou-le-Faucon that had been previously owned by Marguerite's father. This was the estate that Count Pierre d'Alençon had given to Jacques Le Gris. Carrouges felt that he was entitled to the valuable piece of property based on his father-in-law's previous claim. His lawsuit was undoubtedly fueled by his jealousy of Le Gris. Count Pierre went to his cousin, King Charles VI, to officially confirm his ownership of Aunou-le-Faucon and his right to give it to Le Gris. Carrouges lost the suit and further strained his relationship with Count Pierre's circle. -Eric Jager
Yes. The movie is based on Eric Jager's 2004 book The Last Duel: A True Story of Trial by Combat in Medieval France. Jager is an English professor at UCLA. The book also inspired a similarly titled 2008 drama-documentary that chronicled the Jean de Carrouges duel, which aired on BBC Four.
Yes. The Last Duel true story confirms that the charge, to which Le Gris denied, is what led to the Jean de Carrouges and Jacques Le Gris' duel. The circumstances surrounding the rape unfold in the movie much like author Eric Jager describes it in the book. Carrouges had set off on a trip to Paris and his wife Marguerite was home alone on the morning of January 18, 1386. Her mother-in-law had left to tend to legal business in a neighboring town and took almost all of the servants with her.
The truth of whether squire Jacques Le Gris raped Marguerite de Carrouges, the wife of Norman knight Jean de Carrouges, is unknown and has been a subject of debate among historians and jurists. Jacques Le Gris lawyer, Jean Le Coq, who was almost certainly an eyewitness to the duel, recorded his thoughts on the case in a personal notebook, the text of which has endured through the ages. While he did outline arguments that supported his client, he also expressed private doubts regarding the innocence of Le Gris. While facing death at the end of the judicial duel, Le Gris never admitted to the charge. However, confessing would have damned him to the same fate. -HROARR
The Last Duel fact-check confirms that Carrouges felt that the initial legal proceedings were heavily tilted against himself and his wife. Count Pierre d'Alençon, who was an ally of Jacques Le Gris, presided over the local trial. Carrouges had such little faith that he would receive a just outcome, neither he nor his wife showed up at the proceedings. Furthermore, the word of Marguerite, the only witness, carried little weight in this time period. As expected, Count Pierre dropped the charge against Le Gris. In response, Carrouges went to Paris and appealed directly to King Charles VI.
According to Eric Jager's book The Last Duel, the alleged rape of Jean de Carrouges' wife Marguerite happened on January 18, 1386. By the time the criminal trial was underway in the summer of that year, Marguerite was noticeably pregnant. While this should have added weight to Marguerite's claim, it did not. According to medical knowledge at the time, children could not be conceived out of rape, therefore Marguerite's physical state was determined to have no relevance to the case.
Yes. The idea was that if her husband lost the duel, the outcome would "prove" that Marguerite was guilty of perjury, meaning that her claim that she was raped would be considered a lie. She would then be immediately taken to Montfaucon and burned at the stake.
As depicted in the Ridley Scott movie, The Last Duel true story affirms that the real trial by combat took place next to an inside wall of the Priory of Saint-Martin-des-Champs, an important monastery that was located in what is today the city of Paris. At the time, it was located outside the walls of the city, hence it being referred to as "des champs" (in the fields). The priory's surviving buildings have been home to the Museum of Arts and Crafts (Musée des Arts et Métiers) since 1802. A historical rendering of The Last Duel's real-life location is displayed below, along with an image of one of the surviving buildings.
Yes. There is little dispute over whether or not the King was at the December 29, 1386 duel. The two contemporary historical accounts of the duel that are considered the most reliable (because they were likely eyewitness accounts) mention the King being present, and we found no accounts denying it. In fact, according to the writings of the Monk of Saint-Denis, the King's official historian, the duel was initially set for November 27, 1386. However, as stated in Eric Jager's book, King Charles VI was delayed on his return trip to Paris due to bad roads in Flanders. He sent a messenger to Paris, ordering that Jean de Carrouges' duel be postponed a month so that he would be able to attend. It was then rescheduled for December 29, 1386. The King's family was present, including several royal dukes. Many of the most esteemed French nobles were in attendance as well, along with thousands of ordinary French citizens. It's true that the King, who came to the throne when he was 11, was 18 at the time of the duel and still rather young.
In Eric Jager's book, Marguerite is dressed in black and sitting in a carriage overlooking the field. However, in the personal notes of Jacques Le Gris' lawyer, Jean Le Coq, who was likely an eyewitness, he states that the wife of Jean de Carrouges "was brought in a cart, but swiftly sent back by order of the King." Therefore, it is unlikely that the real Marguerite saw the duel. The movie places her even closer for dramatic effect.
While carrying out The Last Duel fact-check, we discovered that two of the most trusted contemporary historical texts that describe the duel mention that Carrouges (Matt Damon in the movie) was weak because of fevers. Jean Le Coq, the lawyer of Jacques Le Gris who likely witnessed the duel, stated that "even though Carrouges was weak because of fevers, he himself said they helped him."
Yes. The personal notes of Le Gris' lawyer, Jean Le Coq, describe him as being made a knight "a little before he entered the field." The idea was that if Le Gris was made a knight, then the two men would be of equal standing during the fight.
No. There are five contemporary historical texts that describe the duel. Two of those texts, one written by the Monk of Saint-Denis, Michel Pintoin, and the other written by Jacques Le Gris' lawyer, Jean Le Coq, are likely firsthand accounts and are considered to be the most accurate. Pintoin was King Charles VI's official historian and was often at the King's side.
Jean de Carrouges (Matt Damon) fighting Jacques Le Gris (Adam Driver) with an axe is unlikely to have occurred in real life, as it does not appear in any of the five contemporary historical texts that describe the duel. Of everything that unfolds during the duel between Carrouges and Le Gris in the movie, this is arguably the least historically accurate element.
No. This appears to be movie fiction that was drawn from a fictional element in Eric Jager's book The Last Duel. King Charles VI's official historian, Michel Pintoin, who was likely at his side and observed the duel, wrote that the two men "abandoned their horses" at the start of the battle. Jean Froissart, who was living in the kingdom of the Netherlands at the time, wrote about the duel several years after it took place and stated that the two men "arranged themselves on foot" after first being on their horses. None of the contemporary historical accounts of the duel mention either of the horses dying during the duel.
It's possible that the two men held shields during the fight, but it seems unlikely given that Carrouges had his sword in his right hand and grappled Le Gris with his left hand, throwing him to the ground. Eric Jager's book describes the lance heads being buried in the shields during the joust. The shields are then damaged more when they are hacked at in the book's almost-certainly-fictional equestrian axe battle. Even if we were to take Jager and the movie's account as fact, the shields would not have magically regenerated for the sword fight, as they seem to do in Jager's book.
In his book, Eric Jager portrays Jean de Carrouges and Jacques Le Gris as using single-handed cutting and thrusting swords worn on their belts, which he somewhat confusingly refers to as "estocs." Most estocs (or tucks) that we've researched are two-handed. It seems just as possible that they would have been using longswords in 1386, especially given that they were fully armored. Specifically, these would have likely been standard 14th-century type XV arming swords. If they were indeed using longswords, it's also possible they were half-swording. This involves gripping the sword blade near the center with the opposite hand in order to deliver more forceful blows into an opponent's armor. -HROARR
No, at least not according to the historians and observers who chronicled the duel. The King's official historian, the Monk of Saint-Denis, who is believed to have been present at the duel, said that after Jean de Carrouges grabbed Jacques Le Gris' helmet and threw him to the ground, "he drew his sword and killed his enemy with great difficulty, because he was encased in armour." It doesn't make sense that Carrouges would draw his sword at that point since he had already been fighting with it. However, it does make sense that he drew a second, smaller sword that would have been easier to use to finish off a downed Le Gris.
Not likely. The most reliable historical accounts of The Last Duel true story do not mention Carrouges lifting Le Gris' visor and stabbing him in the throat. The book's author, Eric Jager, seems to possibly be drawing this from later, less reliable retellings. Revealing Le Gris' face certainly adds to the drama in the movie and book, especially since we know that Carrouges repeatedly demanded that Le Gris admit he raped Marguerite. Jager also describes Carrouges fumbling with the lock on Le Gris' visor, yet there is no evidence of such locks existing this early in history.
Le Gris' lifeless body was reportedly taken to the gibbet (a structure or gallows from which dead or dying bodies were hung for public display) at Montfaucon located outside the walls of Paris. A historical rendering of the gibbet at Montfaucon is displayed below. Le Gris body was hung from chains where it was left to rot for the next several months as a reminder of the fate of rapists, liars, traitors, etc.
Yes. The December 29, 1386 duel between Norman knight Jean de Carrouges (Matt Damon in the movie) and Jacques Le Gris (played by Adam Driver) was the last officially recognized trial by combat in the jurisdiction of the Parliament of Paris. Judicial duels had already become rare by that point.
Yes. Carrouges' victory at the duel allowed him to rise financially and professionally. According to medieval historian Jean Froissart, Carrouges was awarded 1,000 francs along with a royal income of 200 francs per year. A few weeks after the fight, Parliament awarded him an additional 6,000 livres in gold and he was given the position of King Charles VI's royal squire.
In order to determine the overall accuracy of Ridley Scott's The Last Duel, we have to look at the accuracy of author Eric Jager's book on which the movie was based. We know that various parts of Jager's book are fiction. In the author's note, he admits as much, stating, "Where the historical record is silent, I use my own invention to fill in some of the gaps." Jager's substantial lack of references and footnotes, in addition to his questionable understanding of the weapons and armor of that period, raises significant doubt around the book's overall historical accuracy. The book itself seems to take the level of creative license that is usually reserved for films.